Fake male profile photos

/ Views: 41541

This article is about the type of hoax. For the online type and the websites that specialize in it, see . For other uses, see .

Three running men carrying papers with the labels "Humbug News", "Fake News", and "Cheap Sensation". Reporters with various forms of "fake news" from an 1894 illustration by

Fake news is a type of or that consists of deliberate or spread via traditional print and broadcast or online . This false information is mainly distributed by social media, but is periodically circulated through mainstream media.Fake news is written and published with the intent to mislead in order to damage an agency, entity, or person, and/or gain financially or politically, often using sensationalist, dishonest, or outright fabricated to increase readership, online sharing, and Internet click revenue. In the latter case, it is similar to sensational online "" headlines and relies on advertising revenue generated from this activity, regardless of the veracity of the published stories. Intentionally misleading and deceptive fake news differs from obvious or , which is intended to amuse rather than mislead its audience.

The relevance of fake news has increased in . For media outlets, the ability to attract viewers to their websites is necessary to generate online advertising revenue. If publishing a story with false content attracts users, this benefits advertisers and improves ratings. Easy access to online revenue, increased political polarization, and the popularity of , primarily the , have all been implicated in the spread of fake news, which competes with legitimate news stories. Hostile government actors have also been implicated in generating and propagating fake news, particularly during elections.

Fake news undermines serious media coverage and makes it more difficult for journalists to cover significant news stories. An analysis by found that the top 20 fake news stories about the received more engagement on Facebook than the top 20 election stories from 19 major media outlets. Anonymously-hosted lacking known publishers have also been criticized, because they make it difficult to prosecute sources of fake news for .

During and after his presidential campaign and election, began to use the term "fake news" to describe negative press coverage of his presidency.



Fake news is a often used to refer to fabricated news. This type of news, found in traditional news, or , has no basis in fact, but is presented as being factually accurate. Michael Radutzky, a producer of CBS , said his show considers fake news to be "stories that are provably false, have enormous traction [popular appeal] in the culture, and are consumed by millions of people". These stories can not only be found in politics, but also in areas like vaccination, stock values and nutrition. He did not include fake news that is "invoked by politicians against the media for stories that they don't like or for comments that they don't like". Guy Campanile, also a 60 Minutes producer said, "What we are talking about are stories that are fabricated out of thin air. By most measures, deliberately, and by any definition, that's a lie." The intention and purpose behind fake news is important. In some cases, what appears to be fake news may in fact be , which uses exaggeration and introduces non-factual elements that are intended to amuse or make a point, rather than to deceive. can also be fake news. Some researchers have highlighted that "fake news" may be distinguished not just by the falsity of its content, but also the "character of [its] online circulation and reception".

Claire Wardle of identifies seven types of fake news:

  1. satire or parody ("no intention to cause harm but has potential to fool")
  2. false connection ("when headlines, visuals or captions don't support the content")
  3. misleading content ("misleading use of information to or an individual")
  4. false context ("when genuine content is shared with false contextual information")
  5. imposter content ("when genuine sources are impersonated" with false, made-up sources)
  6. manipulated content ("when genuine information or imagery is manipulated to deceive", as with a "doctored" photo)
  7. fabricated content ("new content is 100% false, designed to deceive and do harm")

In the context of the United States of America and its election processes in the 2010s, fake news generated considerable controversy and argument, with some commentators defining concern over it as or and others worried about damage done to public trust. In January 2017 the United Kingdom conducted a into the "growing phenomenon of fake news".

Some, most notably United States President , have broadened the meaning of "fake news" to include accurate news they don't like. Trump confirmed this interpretation of fake news as negative news about himself in a tweet on May 9, 2018.


The (IFLA) published a summary in diagram form (pictured at right) to assist people in recognizing fake news. Its main points are:

  1. Consider the source (to understand its mission and purpose)
  2. Read beyond the headline (to understand the whole story)
  3. Check the authors (to see if they are real and credible)
  4. Assess the supporting sources (to ensure they support the claims)
  5. Check the date of publication (to see if the story is relevant and up to date)
  6. Ask if it is a joke (to determine if it is meant to be )
  7. Review your own biases (to see if they are affecting your judgement)
  8. Ask experts (to get confirmation from independent people with knowledge).

The International Fact-Checking Network (IFCN), launched in 2015, supports international collaborative efforts in fact-checking, provides training and has published a code of principles. In 2017 it introduced an application and vetting process for journalistic organisations. One of IFCN's verified signatories, the independent, not-for-profit media journal , created a short animation explaining its fact checking process, which involves "extra checks and balances, including by a second academic expert, additional scrutiny and editorial oversight".

Beginning in the 2017 school year, children in Taiwan study a new curriculum designed to teach critical reading of propaganda and the evaluation of sources. Called "media literacy", the course provides training in journalism in the new information society.

Historical examples


stone sculpture of a man's head and neck Roman politician and general killed himself because of misinformation.

In the 13th century BC, spread lies and propaganda portraying the as a stunning victory for the Egyptians; he depicted scenes of himself smiting his foes during the battle on the walls of nearly all his temples. The treaty between the Egyptians and the Hittites, however, reveals that the battle was actually a .

During the first century BC, ran a campaign of misinformation against his rival , portraying him as a drunkard, a womanizer, and a mere puppet of the Egyptian queen . He published a document purporting to be Marc Antony's will, which claimed that Marc Antony, upon his death, wished to be entombed in the mausoleum of the Ptolemaic pharaohs. Although the document may have been forged, it invoked outrage from the Roman populace. Marc Antony ultimately killed himself after his defeat in the upon hearing false rumors propagated by Cleopatra herself claiming that she had committed suicide.

During the second and third centuries AD, false rumors were spread about Christians claiming that they engaged in ritual and . In the late third century AD, the invented and exaggerated stories about pagans engaging in acts of immorality and cruelty, while the writer invented similar stories about Christians.


The story of dying from an arrow in the eye, shot by invaders in 1066, shifted at least once. Early accounts in the late 11th century only briefly mentioned that Harold was ‘pierced with mortal wounds’. It took until the early 12th century for the now-famous arrow story to emerge:

"Such is the extent of the confusion that some historians, including Harold’s biographer, Ian Walker, have suggested that the manner of his death had been so distasteful or ignominious that both authors had deliberately avoided the topic. The fact that an alternative story to the ‘arrow in the eye’ tale was beginning to emerge in the early twelfth century, a generation after the battle, suggests that the ducal court had censored the earliest accounts of the Conquest. In this version, Harold meets a grisly end; having been blinded by an arrow, he is unceremoniously hacked to the ground under the blows of Norman knights. But the ‘hacking episode’ in this story can be traced back to the Song of the Battle of Hastings, a poem written by the French bishop, Guy of Amiens, as early as 1067. Bishop Guy says nothing about an arrow hitting Harold. Instead, Duke William himself gathers together three other knights and they cut Harold to pieces. The absence of the ‘hacking episode’ from the earliest Norman accounts and its subsequent inclusion in the histories written in the early twelfth century is suggestive. It is conceivable that the Norman court withheld it during William’s reign because his advisors were concerned that the manner of Harold’s death would have undermined the legitimacy of his own accession.

But many historians do not endorse this version of his death. It can be found in its most developed form in Wace’s verse history of the Normans, written in the 1170s, but its appearance here has only weakened its plausibility. There is, in general, a reluctance to accept evidence from verse histories because the distinction between fact and fiction is often less clear in poetry."

In 1475, a fake news story in claimed that the Jewish community had murdered a two-and-a-half-year-old Christian infant named . The story resulted in all the Jews in the city being arrested and tortured; fifteen of them were burned at the stake. himself attempted to stamp out the story, but, by that point, it had already spread beyond anyone's control. Stories of this kind were known as ""; they claimed that Jews purposely killed Christians, especially Christian children, and used their blood for religious or ritual purposes.

Early modern period

After the invention of the printing press in 1439, publications became widespread but there was no standard of journalistic ethics to follow. By the 17th century, historians began the practice of citing their sources in . In 1610 when went on trial, the demand for verifiable news increased.

During the 18th century publishers of fake news were fined and banned in the Netherlands; one man, Gerard Lodewijk van der Macht, was banned four times by Dutch authorities—and four times he moved and restarted his press. In the American colonies, wrote fake news about murderous "scalping" Indians working with King in an effort to sway public opinion in favor of the American Revolution.

, the successors of the 16th century , were sold in Paris on the street for two centuries, starting in the 17th century. In 1793, was executed in part because of popular hatred engendered by a canard on which her face had been printed.

During the era of slave-owning in the United States, supporters of slavery propagated fake news stories about African Americans, whom white people considered to have lower status. Violence occurred in reaction to the spread of some fake news events. In one instance, stories of African Americans spontaneously turning white spread through the south and struck fear into the hearts of many people.

Rumors and anxieties about slave rebellions were common in Virginia from the beginning of the colonial period, despite the only major uprising occurring in the 19th century. One particular instance of fake news regarding revolts occurred in 1730. The serving governor of Virginia at the time, Governor William Gooch, reported that a slave rebellion had occurred but was effectively put down – although this never happened. After Gooch discovered the falsehood, he ordered slaves found off plantations to be punished, tortured, and made prisoners.

19th century

b&w drawing of a man with large bat-wings reaching from over his head to mid-thigh A "lunar animal" said to have been discovered by on the

One instance of fake news was the of 1835. The New York Sun published articles about a real-life astronomer and a made-up colleague who, according to the hoax, had observed bizarre life on the moon. The fictionalized articles successfully attracted new subscribers, and the penny paper suffered very little backlash after it admitted the next month that the series had been a hoax. Such stories were intended to entertain readers, and not to mislead them.

In the late 19th century, and other publishers goaded the United States into the , which was precipitated when the exploded in the harbor of , .

two men dressed as the Yellow Kid pushing on opposite sides of oversize building blocks bearing the letters W A R"

20th century

During the , an example of was that of an alleged "" in which the German battlefield dead were rendered down for fats used to make , candles, lubricants, , and boot dubbing. Unfounded rumors regarding such a factory circulated in the press starting in 1915, and by 1917 the English-language publication presented these allegations as true at a time when Britain was trying to convince China to join the Allied war effort; this was based on new, allegedly true stories from and that turned out to be forgeries. These false allegations became known as such after the war, and in the used the story in order to as British propaganda. According to and , the story also "encouraged later disbelief" when reports about the Holocaust surfaced after the liberation of and . After Hitler and the rose to power in Germany in 1933, they established the under the control of Propaganda Minister . The Nazis used both print and broadcast journalism to promote their agendas, either by obtaining ownership of those media or exerting political influence. Throughout , both the and the employed fake news in the form of propaganda to persuade publics at home and in enemy countries. The British used radio broadcasts and distributed leaflets to discourage German troops.

The has published that printed fake news "depicting Russia as a socialist paradise." During 1932–1933, The New York Times published numerous articles by its Moscow bureau chief, , who won a for a series of reports about the Soviet Union.

explaining to reporters about his radio drama "" on Sunday, October 30, 1938, the day after the broadcast

"" is a 1938 episode of the American anthology series . Directed and narrated by actor and filmmaker , the episode was an adaptation of ' novel (1898), presented as a series of simulated news bulletins. Although preceded by a clear introduction that the show was a drama, it became famous for allegedly causing mass panic, although the reality of the panic is disputed as the program had relatively few listeners. An investigation was run by The Federal Communications Commission to examine the mass hysteria produced by this radio programming; no law was found broken. This event was an example the early stages of society's dependency on information from print to radio and other mediums. Fake news can even be found within this example, the true extent of the "hysteria" from the radio broadcast has also been falsely recorded. The most extreme case and reaction after the radio broadcast was a group of Grover Mill locals attacking a water tower because they falsely identified it as an alien.

21st century

In the 21st century, the impact of fake news became widespread, as well as the usage of the term. The opening of the Internet to the people in the 90s was a movement meant to allow them access to information. Over time, the Internet has grown to unimaginable heights with tons of information coming in all the time which allows the Internet to be a host for plenty of unwanted, untruthful and misleading information that can be made by anyone. Besides referring to made-up stories designed to deceive readers into clicking on links, maximizing traffic and profit, the term has also referred to satirical news, whose purpose is not to mislead but rather to inform viewers and share humorous commentary about real news and the . United States examples of satire (as opposed to fake news) include the television show 's , , , and newspaper.

21st century fake news is often intended to increase the financial profits of the news outlet. In an interview with , Jestin Coler, former CEO of the fake media conglomerate , said who writes fake news articles, who funds these articles, and why fake news creators create and distribute false information. Coler, who has since left his role as a fake news creator, said that his company employed 20 to 25 writers at a time and made ,000 to ,000 monthly from advertisements. Coler began his career in journalism as a magazine salesman before working as a freelance writer. He said he entered the fake news industry to prove to himself and others just how rapidly fake news can spread. Disinfomedia is not the only outlet responsible for the distribution of fake news; Facebook users play a major role in feeding into fake news stories by making sensationalized stories "trend", according to media editor Craig Silverman, and the individuals behind Google AdSense basically fund fake news websites and their content., CEO of Facebook, said, "I think the idea that fake news on Facebook influenced the election in any way, I think is a pretty crazy idea", and then a few days later he blogged that Facebook was looking for ways to flag fake news stories.

Many online pro- fake news stories are being sourced out of a city of in , where approximately seven different fake news organizations are employing hundreds of teenagers to rapidly produce and plagiarize sensationalist stories for different U.S. based companies and parties.

One fake news writer, , was behind the widespread hoax that he was the graffiti artist and had been arrested; that a man stopped a robbery in a diner by quoting ; and that he had an "enormous impact" on the , according to . These stories consistently appeared in 's top news search results, were shared widely on , were taken seriously, and shared by third parties such as manager , , , and the . Horner later claimed that his work during this period was intended "to make Trump's supporters look like idiots for sharing my stories".

In a November 2016 interview with , Horner expressed regret for the role his fake news stories played in the election and surprise at how gullible people were in treating his stories as news. In February 2017 Horner said, "I truly regret my comment about saying that I think Donald Trump is in the White House because of me. I know all I did was attack him and his supporters and got people not to vote for him. When I said that comment it was because I was confused how this evil got elected President and I thought maybe instead of hurting his campaign, maybe I had helped it. My intention was to get his supporters NOT to vote for him and I know for a fact that I accomplished that goal. The far right, a lot of the Bible thumpers and were going to vote him regardless, but I know I swayed so many that were on the fence."

In December 2016, while speaking on , Horner said that all news is fake news and said "spread misinformation", which was one month before Trump leveled the same criticism at that network.

Horner spoke at the European Parliament in March, speaking about fake news and the importance of fact checking. According to a 2017 BuzzFeed article, Horner stated that a story of his about a rape festival in India helped generate over 0,000 in donations to , a site that helps rape victims in India. Horner said he dislikes being grouped with people who write fake news solely to be misleading. "They just write it just to write fake news, like there's no purpose, there's no satire, there's nothing clever. All the stories I wrote were to make Trump's supporters look like idiots for sharing my stories." called Horner a "Performance Artist". Horner has been referred to as a "hoax artist" by outlets such as the and the .

Kim LaCapria of the fact checking website has stated that, in America, fake news is a bipartisan phenomenon, saying that "[t]here has always been a sincerely held yet erroneous belief misinformation is more , and that has never been true." Jeff Green of Trade Desk agrees the phenomenon affects both sides. Green's company found that affluent and well-educated persons in their 40s and 50s are the primary consumers of fake news. He told of that this audience tends to live in an "echo chamber" and that these are the people who vote.

In 2014, the used via networks such as to create a counter-narrative after Russian-backed Ukrainian rebels shot down . In 2016, claimed it had seen a significant rise in Russian propaganda and fake news stories since the invasion of Crimea in 2014.Fake news stories originating from Russian government officials were also circulated internationally by news agency and published in the most popular news websites in the United States.

A 2018 study at Oxford University found that Trump's supporters consumed the "largest volume of 'junk news' on Facebook and Twitter":

"On Twitter, a network of Trump supporters consumes the largest volume of junk news, and junk news is the largest proportion of news links they share," the researchers concluded. On Facebook, the skew was even greater. There, "extreme hard right pages – distinct from Republican pages – share more junk news than all the other audiences put together."

In 2018, researchers from , , and the examined the consumption of fake news during the 2016 U.S. presidential campaign. Their findings showed that Trump supporters and older Americans (over 60) were far more likely to consume fake news than Clinton supporters. Those most likely to visit fake news websites were the 10% of Americans who consumed the most information. There was a very large difference (800%) in the consumption of fake news stories as related to total news consumption between Trump supporters (6.2%) and Clinton supporters (0.8%).

The study also showed that fake pro-Trump and fake pro-Clinton news stories were read by their supporters, but with a significant difference: Trump supporters consumed far more (40%) than Clinton supporters (15%). Facebook was by far the key "gateway" website where these fake stories were spread, and which led people to then go to the fake news websites. of fake news were rarely seen by consumers, with none of those who saw a fake news story being reached by a related fact check.

, one of the researchers, emphatically stated in an interview on NBC News: "People got vastly more misinformation from Donald Trump than they did from fake news websites – full stop."

NBC NEWS: "It feels like there's a connection between having an active portion of a party that's prone to seeking false stories and conspiracies and a president who has famously spread conspiracies and false claims. In many ways, demographically and ideologically, the president fits the profile of the fake news users that you're describing."

NYHAN: "It's worrisome if fake news websites further weaken the norm against false and misleading information in our politics, which unfortunately has eroded. But it's also important to put the content provided by fake news websites in perspective. People got vastly more misinformation from Donald Trump than they did from fake news websites – full stop."

Another issue in mainstream media is the usage of the , a "bubble" that has been created that gives the viewer, on social media platforms, a specific piece of the information knowing they will like it. Thus creating fake news and biased news because only half the story is being shared, the portion the viewer liked. "In 1996, Nicolas Negroponte predicted a world where information technologies become increasingly customizable." Decades ago people predicted that customized news would become a reality. This becomes a problem in today's society because people are seeing only bits and pieces and not the whole issues making it much harder to solve the issues or talk about it worldwide.

On the Internet

Main article:

See also:

The roots of fake news

Main article:

The term "fake news" gained importance with the electoral context in Western Europe and North America. It is determined by content in news format and its velocity. According to Bounegru, Gray, Venturini and Mauri, fake news is when a deliberate lie "is picked up by dozens of other , retransmitted by hundreds of websites, cross-posted over thousands of social media accounts and read by hundreds of thousands" that it then effectively becomes "fake news".

The evolving nature of online business models encourages the production of information that is "click-worthy" independently of its accuracy.

The nature of trust depends on the assumptions that non-institutional forms of communication are freer from power and more able to report information that are perceived as unable or unwilling to reveal. Declines in confidence in much traditional media and expert knowledge have created fertile grounds for alternative, and often obscure sources of information to appear as authoritative and credible. This ultimately leaves users confused about basic facts.

Internet companies with threatened credibility tend to develop new responses to limit fake news and reduce financial incentives for its proliferation.

In websites

When the Internet was first made accessible for public use in the 1990s, its main purpose was for the seeking and accessing of information. As fake news was introduced to the Internet, this made it difficult for some people to find truthful information. The impact of fake news has become a worldwide phenomenon.Fake news is often spread through the use of , which, in order to gain credibility, specialize in creating attention-grabbing news, which often well-known news sources. Jestin Coler, who said he does it for "fun", also said he earned US,000 per month from advertising on his fake news websites. In 2017, the inventor of the , claimed that fake news was one of the three most significant new disturbing Internet trends that must first be resolved, if the Internet is to be capable of truly "serving humanity." The other two new disturbing trends that Berners-Lee described as threatening the Internet were the recent surge in the use of the Internet by governments for both citizen-surveillance purposes, and for cyber-warfare purposes. Research has shown that fake news hurts social media and online based outlets far worse than traditional print and TV outlets. After a survey was conducted, it was found that 58% of people had less trust in social media news stories as opposed to 24% of people in mainstream media after learning about fake news.

Intentionally deceptive photoshopped image of Hillary Clinton over 1977 photo of Peoples Temple Reverend Jim Jones.

Bots on social media

In the mid 1990s, anticipated a world where news through technology become progressively personalized. In his 1996 book Being Digital he predicted a digital life where news consumption becomes an extremely personalized experience and newspapers adapted content to reader preferences. This prediction has since been reflected in news and social media feeds of modern day.

Bots have the potential to increase the spread of fake news, as they use algorithms to decide what articles and information specific users like, without taking into account the authenticity of an article. Bots mass produce and spread articles, regardless of the credibility of the sources, allowing them to play an essential role in the mass spread of fake news, as bots are capable of creating fake accounts and personalities on the web that are then gaining followers, recognition, and authority. Additionally, almost 30% of the spam and content spread on the Internet originates from these software bots.

In the 21st century, the capacity to mislead was enhanced by the widespread use of social media. For example, one 21st century website that enabled fake news' proliferation was the . In late 2016 fake news gained notoriety following the uptick in news content by this means, and its prevalence on the site . In the United States, 62% of Americans use social media to receive news. Many people use their Facebook news feed to get news, despite Facebook not being considered a news site. According to Craig McClain, over 66% of Facebook users obtain news from the site. This, in combination with increased political polarization and , led to a tendency for readers to mainly read headlines.

Numerous individuals and news outlets have stated that fake news may have influenced the outcome of the .Fake news saw higher sharing on Facebook than legitimate news stories, which analysts explained was because fake news often panders to expectations or is otherwise more exciting than legitimate news. itself initially denied this characterization. A poll conducted in December 2016 found that 64% of U.S. adults believed completely made-up news had caused "a great deal of confusion" about the basic facts of current events, while 24% claimed it had caused "some confusion" and 11% said it had caused "not much or no confusion". Additionally, 23% of those polled admitted they had personally shared fake news, whether knowingly or not. Researchers from assessed that only 8% of readers of fake news recalled and believed in the content they were reading, though the same share of readers also recalled and believed in "placebos" – stories they did not actually read, but that were produced by the authors of the study. In comparison, over 50% of the participants recalled reading and believed in true news stories.

By August 2017 Facebook stopped using the term "fake news" and used "false news" in its place instead. Will Oremus of wrote that because supporters of had redefined the word "fake news" to refer to mainstream media opposed to them, "it makes sense for Facebook—and others—to cede the term to the right-wing trolls who have claimed it as their own."

Research from concluded that 30% of all fake news traffic, as opposed to only 8% of real news traffic, could be linked back to Facebook. Fake news consumers, they concluded, do not exist in a ; many of them also consume real news from established news sources. The fake news audience is only 10 percent of the real news audience, and most fake news consumers spent a relatively similar amount of time on fake news compared with real news consumers—with the exception of readers, who spent more than 11 times longer reading the website than other users.

In the wake of western events, China's Ren Xianling of the suggested a "reward and punish" system be implemented to avoid fake news.

Internet trolls

In , a is a person who sows discord on the by starting arguments or upsetting people, by posting inflammatory, , or messages in an online community (such as a , forum, , or blog) with the intent of provoking readers into an response or off-topic discussion, often for the troll's amusement. The term troll alludes back to a monster that hides in the shadows and threatens people. Internet trolls also feed on attention.

The idea of internet trolls gained popularity in the 1990s, thought its meaning shifted in 2011. Whereas it once denoted provocation, it is a term now widely used to signify the abuse and misuse of the Internet. Trolling comes in various forms, and can be dissected into abuse trolling, entertainment trolling, classical trolling, flame trolling, anonymous trolling, and kudos trolling. It is closely linked to fake news, as internet trolls are now largely interpreted as perpetrators of false information, information that can often be passed along unwittingly by reporters and the public alike.

When interacting with each other, trolls often share misleading information that contributes to the fake news circulated on sites like and . In the 2016 American election, Russia paid over 1,000 internet trolls to circulate fake news and disinformation about , and they also had the power to create social media accounts that resembled voters in important swing states that spread influential political standpoints.


During the 2016 United States presidential election, the creation and increased substantially. This resulted in a widespread to combat the spread of fake news. The volume and reluctance of fake news websites to respond to fact-checking organizations has posed a problem to inhibiting the spread of fake news through fact checking alone. In an effort to reduce the effects of fake news, fact-checking websites, including and , have posted guides to spotting and avoiding fake news websites. New readings of media events and news with an emphasis on literalism and have also emerged. Social media sites and search engines, such as and , received criticism for facilitating the spread of fake news. Both of these corporations have taken measures to explicitly prevent the spread of fake news; critics, however, believe more action is needed.

After the 2016 American election and the run-up to the German election, Facebook began labeling and warning of inaccurate news and partnered with independent to label inaccurate news, warning readers before sharing it. After a story is flagged as disputed, it will be reviewed by the third-party fact-checkers. Then, if it has been proven to be a fake news story, the post cannot be turned into an ad or promoted. Artificial intelligence is one of the more recent technologies being developed in the United States and Europe to recognize and eliminate fake news through algorithms. In 2017, Facebook targeted 30,000 accounts related to the spread of misinformation regarding the .

In March 2018, launched Google News Initiative (GNI) to fight the spread of fake news. It launched GNI under the belief that quality and identifying truth online is crucial. GNI has three goals: “to elevate and strengthen quality journalism, evolve business models to drive sustainable growth and empower news organizations through technological innovation.” To achieve the first goal, Google created the Disinfo Lab, which combats the spread of fake news during crucial times such as elections or breaking news. The company is also working to adjust its systems to display more trustworthy content during times of breaking news. To make it easier for users to subscribe to media publishers, Google created Subscribe with Google. Additionally, they have created a dashboard, News Consumer Insights that allows news organizations to better understand their audiences using data and analytics. Google will spend 0 million through 2021 on these efforts, among others, to combat fake news.

Usage of the term by Donald Trump

President Trump has claimed that the mainstream American media regularly reports fake news. His doing so is seen as having increased distrust of the American media globally, particularly in Russia. His claims have given credibility to the stories in the Russian media that label American news, especially news about atrocities committed by the Syrian regime against its own people, where it was quoted that "munitions at the air base had as much to do with chemical weapons as the test tube in the hands of Colin Powell had to do with weapons of mass destruction in Iraq", as just more fake American news.

Trump has carried on a war against the mainstream media, often attacking it as "fake news" and "the "enemy of the people".

According to Jeff Hemsley, a professor who studies social media, Trump uses this term for any news that is not favorable to him or which he simply dislikes. Trump provided a widely cited example of this interpretation in a tweet on May 9, 2018:

Donald J. Trump✓ via @realDonaldTrump

The Fake News is working overtime. Just reported that, despite the tremendous success we are having with the economy & all things else, 91% of the Network News about me is negative (Fake). Why do we work so hard in working with the media when it is corrupt? Take away credentials?

May 9, 2018

described the tweet on CNN as an "accidental" revelation about Trump's "'fake news' attacks", and wrote: "The point can be summed up in these two words from Trump: 'negative (Fake).' To Trump, those words mean the same thing. Negative news coverage is fake news. Fake news is negative news coverage." Other writers made similar comments about the tweet. Dara Lind wrote in : "It's nice of Trump to admit, explicitly, what many skeptics have suspected all along: When he complains about 'fake news,' he doesn't actually mean 'news that is untrue'; he means news that is personally inconvenient to Donald Trump." wrote in magazine: "Trump admits he calls all negative news 'fake'.": "In a tweet this morning, Trump casually opened a window into the source code for his method of identifying liberal media bias. Anything that's negative is, by definition, fake." Philip Bump wrote in : "The important thing in that tweet....is that he makes explicit his view of what constitutes fake news. It's negative news. Negative. (Fake.)" In an interview with , before the cameras were turned on, Trump explained why he attacks the press: "You know why I do it? I do it to discredit you all and demean you all so that when you write negative stories about me no one will believe you."

Author and literary critic has described developments in the right-wing media and websites:

"FOX News and the planetary system of right-wing news sites that would orbit it and, later, Breitbart, were particularly adept at weaponizing such arguments and exploiting the increasingly partisan fervor animating the Republican base: They accused the media establishment of “liberal bias,” and substituted their own right-wing views as “fair and balanced” – a redefinition of terms that was a harbinger of Trump’s hijacking of “fake news” to refer not to alt-right conspiracy theories and Russian troll posts, but to real news that he perceived as inconvenient or a threat to himself."

Because of the manner in which Trump has co-opted the term, media columnist has warned fellow journalists that "It's time to retire the tainted term 'fake news'. Though the term hasn't been around long, its meaning already is lost."

Fake news by country


A well-known case of fabricated news in happened in 2009 when a report Deception Detection Across Australian Populations of a "Levitt Institute" was widely cited on the news websites all over the country, claiming that was the most naive city, despite the fact that the report itself contained a cue: amidst the mathematical gibberish, there was a statement: "These results were completely made up to be fictitious material through a process of modified truth and credibility nodes." The Australian Parliament initiated investigation into "fake news" regarding issues surrounding fake news that occurred during the 2016 United States election. The inquiry looks at a few major areas in Australia to find audiences most vulnerable to fake news, by considering the impact on traditional journalism, and by evaluating the liability of online advertisers and by regulating the spreading the hoaxes. This act of parliament is meant to combat the threat of social media power on spreading fakes news as concluded negative results to the public.


Politicians in Austria dealt with the impact of fake news and its spread on social media after the 2016 presidential campaign in the country. In December 2016, a court in Austria issued an injunction on Facebook Europe, mandating it block negative postings related to , Chairwoman. According to The Washington Post the postings to Facebook about her "appeared to have been spread via a fake profile" and directed derogatory epithets towards the Austrian politician. The derogatory postings were likely created by the identical fake profile that had previously been utilized to attack , who won the election for .


Brazil faced increasing influence from fake news after the of President and in August 2016. BBC Brazil reported in April 2016 that in the week surrounding one of the impeachment votes, three out of the five most-shared articles on Facebook in Brazil were fake. In 2015, reporter Tai Nalon resigned from her position at Brazilian newspaper in order to start the first fact-checking website in Brazil, called Aos Fatos (To The Facts). Nalon told there was a great deal of fake news, and hesitated to compare the problem to that experienced in the U.S. In fact, Brazil also have problems with fake news and according to a survey have a greater number of people that believe fake news influenced the outcome of their elections (69%) than the United States (47%).


Fake news online was brought to the attention of Canadian politicians in November 2016, as they debated helping assist local newspapers. Member of for specifically discussed fake news as an example of ways in which publishers on the Internet are less accountable than print media. Discussion in parliament contrasted increase of fake news online with downsizing of Canadian newspapers and the impact for democracy in Canada. Representatives from Facebook Canada attended the meeting and told members of Parliament they felt it was their duty to assist individuals gather data online.

In January 2017, the of admitted to spreading fake news, including false claims that was financing . The campaign manager claimed he spread the news in order to provoke negative reactions so that he could determine those who "aren't real Conservatives".

Czech Republic

See also:

Czech Republic has become home to numerous fake news outlets, many redistributing news in Czech and English originally produced by Russian sources. Czech president has been supporting media outlets accused of spreading fake news.

The Centre Against Terrorism and Hybrid Threats (CTHH) is unit of the primarily aimed at countering , fake news, and foreign . The CTHH started operations on January 1, 2017. The CTHH has been criticized by Czech President , who said: "We don't need censorship. We don't need thought police. We don't need a new agency for press and information as long as we want to live in a free and democratic society."

In 2017 media activists started a website Konspiratori.cz maintaining a list of conspiracy and fake news outlets in Czech.


See also:

Fake news during the 2016 U.S. election spread to China. Articles popularized within the United States were translated into Chinese and spread within China. The used the growing problem of fake news as a rationale for increasing in November 2016. China took the opportunity to publish an editorial in its newspaper called: "Western Media's Crusade Against Facebook", and criticized "unpredictable" political problems posed by freedoms enjoyed by users of , , and . China government leaders meeting in at the third in November 2016 said fake news in the U.S. election justified adding more curbs to free and open use of the Internet. China Deputy Minister Ren Xianliang, official at the , said increasing online participation led to "harmful information" and fraud. Kam Chow Wong, a former law enforcement official and criminal justice professor at , praised attempts in the U.S. to patrol social media. noted China's themes of became more relevant at the World Internet Conference due to the outgrowth of fake news.

The issue of fake news in the 2016 United States election has given the Chinese Government a reason to further criticize Western democracy and press freedom. The Chinese government has also accused Western media organisations of bias, in a move apparently inspired by President Trump.

In March 2017, China used the phrase "Fake News" in the flagship newspaper, People's Daily, run by the ruling communist party and emphasized President Donald Trump's well known phrase as they denounced western news coverage of a Chinese lawyer and human rights advocate who had said they had been tortured by the police. A tweet by Peoples Daily reads "Foreign Media reports that police tortured a detained lawyer is FAKE NEWS, fabricated to tarnish china's image". "The stories were essentially fake news", Xinhua wrote, the state run news agency. The Chinese government is known for its long history of denouncing most western news organizations.

Another internal issue of fake news in China is associated with the power of internet and social media. According to the Chinese government, there is a practice where people who present themselves as Chinese journalists spread fake information about Chinese organisations, politicians, and celebrities until they are paid by the affected parties to stop the action. These people use online social media to spread fake news in order to achieve their goals. According to David Bandurski, University of Hong Kong's China Media Projector, this problem is growing and worsening.


Officials from 11 countries held a meeting in in November 2016, in order to plan the formation of a center to combat disinformation cyber-warfare including spread of fake news on social media. The center is planned to be located in Helsinki and include efforts from 10 countries with participation from Sweden, Germany, Finland, and the U.S. planned to deal with the center in spring 2017 with a motion before the . Jori Arvonen, Deputy Secretary of State for EU Affairs, said cyberwarfare became an increased problem in 2016, and included hybrid cyber-warfare intrusions into Finland from Russia and . Arvonen cited examples including fake news online, disinformation, and the during the Ukrainian crisis.


During the 10-year period preceding 2016, France was witness to an increase in popularity of alternative news sources called the fachosphere ("facho" referring to ); known as the  (). According to sociologist Antoine Bevort, citing data from rankings, the most consulted political websites in France in 2016 included ,  (), and Les Moutons Enragés. These sites increased skepticism towards from both left and right perspectives.

In September 2016, the country faced controversy regarding fake websites providing false information about . The moved forward with intentions to ban such fake sites. , women's minister for France, informed parliament though the fake sites look neutral, in actuality their intentions were specifically targeted to give women fake information.

France saw an uptick in amounts of disinformation and propaganda, primarily in the midst of election cycles. Social media outlets in France were overflowing with fake news prior to the . A study looking at the diffusion of political news during the 2017 presidential election cycle suggests that one in four links shared in social media comes from sources that actively contest traditional media narratives. According to The Independent, Facebook corporate deleted 30,000 Facebook accounts in France associated with fake political information.

Macron’s presidential campaign was attacked by the fake news articles much more than the campaigns of more conservative candidates like Marine Le Pen. Many sources believe the fake information was coming from Russia, similar to what happened in the recent US presidential election. One of the fake articles announced that Marine Le Pen won the presidency before the people of France had even voted. Clinton Watts, at the George Washington University Center for Cyber and Homeland Security believes that these fake political articles will play a significant role in the upcoming German election.

In April 2017, Russian actors were accused by technology companies and Flashpoint of leaking presidential candidate 's private emails and other documents on a file sharing website. The leaked documents were mixed with fake ones in social media in an attempt to sway the upcoming presidential election. The documents were said to include various professional and private emails, as well as memos, contracts and accounting documents. Director of research with IS-based cyber intelligence firm Flashpoint, Vitali Kremez, said his analysis indicated that , a group tied to Russias GRU military intelligence directorate, was behind the leak. However, the head of the French cyber-security agency, , later said that there was no evidence that the hack leading to the leaks had anything to do with Russia, saying that the attack was so simple, that "we can imagine that it was a person who did this alone. They could be in any country."

The newly elected President Macron of France, wants to combat the spread of fake news while he is in office.


lamented the problem of fraudulent news reports in a November 2016 speech, days after announcing her campaign for a fourth term as leader of her country. In a speech to the German parliament, Merkel was critical of such fake sites, saying they harmed political discussion. Merkel called attention to the need of government to deal with , bots, and fake news websites. She warned that such fraudulent news websites were a force increasing the power of extremism. Merkel called fraudulent news a growing phenomenon that might need to be regulated in the future. Germany's foreign intelligence agency Chief, , warned of the potential for by Russia in the . He said the cyberattacks would take the form of the intentional spread of disinformation. Kahl said the goal is to increase chaos in political debates. Germany's domestic intelligence agency Chief, , said sabotage by Russian intelligence was a present threat to German .


Fake news in India has led to episodes of violence between castes and religions and interfered with public policies. It often spreads through the , which had 200 million monthly active users in the country as of February 2017.

On November 8, 2016, India established a on the same day as the . Fake news went viral over Whatsapp that the note came equipped with spying technology that tracked bills 120 meters below the earth. Finance Minister refuted the falsities, but not before they had spread to the country's mainstream news outlets. Later, in May 2017, seven people were lynched as rumor of child abductions spread through WhatsApp in a village.

Prabhakar Kumar of the Indian media research agency CMS, told India was harder hit by fake news because the country lacked media policy for verification. Law enforcement officers in India arrested individuals with charges of creating fictitious articles, predominantly if there was likelihood the articles inflamed societal conflict.

In April 2018, the Information and Broadcasting Ministry said the government would cancel the accreditation of journalists found to be sharing fake news, but this was quickly retracted after criticism that this was an attack on .

In June 2018 mobs murdered a governmental employee, Sukanta Chakraborty, who was fighting against false news and rumours, and two other unrelated people. More people were severely injured. The local government temporarily shut down mobile Internet and texting services.


Recently, Indonesia has seen an increase in the amount of fake news circulating social media. The problem first arose during their , where candidate became a target of a smear campaign which falsely claimed he was the child of Indonesian Communist Party members, of Chinese descent, and a Christian. Unlike the 2016 U.S. presidential election, where the sharing of fake news resulted in increased social-media engagement than real news, inflaming ethnic and political tensions could be potentially deadly in Indonesia, with its recent incidences of domestic terrorism, and its long and bloody history of anticommunist, anti-Christian and anti-Chinese pogroms. The government, watchdog groups, and even religious organizations have taken steps to prevent its spreading, such as blocking certain websites and creating fact-check apps. The largest Islamic mass organization in Indonesia, , has created an anti-fake news campaign called #TurnBackHoax, while other Islamic groups have defined such propagation as tantamount to a sin. While the government currently views criminal punishment as its last resort, officials are working hard to guarantee law enforcement will respect the freedom of expression.

Israel/Palestinian Territories

See also:

Fake news about has been published by the and news agencies.[]. In 1996, people had been killed in the in reaction to fake news accounts. An Egyptian newspaper reported on Israeli spy sharks trained to eat Arab bathers in the Red Sea, an example of a . The Israeli state has been accused of spreading propaganda in the USA. In April 2018, Palestinian-Israeli football team threatened to sue Israeli Prime Minister for libel, after he claimed fans booed during a minute of silence for Israeli flash-flood victims.

In a social media post, Netanyahu blasted various Israeli news critical of him, as fake news including , , and the same day US President Trump decried "fake news".

The Palestinian Islamist political organization, published a political program in 2017 intended to ease its position on Israel. Among other things, this charter accepted the borders of the Palestinian state circa the of 1967. Although this document is an advancement from their previous 1988 charter, which called for the destruction of the State of ‘’’Israel’’’, it still does not recognize Israel as legitimate independent nation. In a video, Prime Minister of Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu responded to the coverage of this event by news outlets such as Al Jazeera, CNN, New York Times and The Guardian, calling their reporting fake news. He specifically disagreed with the notion that Hamas had accepted the state of Israel within their new charter, and called this "a complete distortion of the truth.” Instead he said, “The new Hamas document says Israel has no right to exist.” In a later speech, addressed to his supporters, Netanyahu responded to allegations against him: “The fake news industry is at its peak… Look, for example, how they cover with unlimited enthusiasm, every week, the left-wing demonstration. The same demonstrations whose goal is to apply improper pressure on law enforcement authorities so they will file an indictment at any price.” Observers likened his blanketed use of the term, ‘fake news’, for describing left-wing media to Donald Trump, and his similar statements during the 2016 election cycle.


In April 2018, Malaysia implemented the Anti-Fake News Bill 2018, a controversial law that deemed publishing and circulating misleading information as a crime punishable by up to six years in prison and/or fines of up to 500,000 ringit. At implemention, the country’s prime minister was , whose associates were connected to the mishandling of at least .5 billion by a report. Of that sum of money, 1 million was deposited into bank accounts controlled by Razak. The convergence between the fake news law and Razak’s connection to scandal was made clear by the Malaysian minister of communications and multimedia, , who said that tying Razak to a specific dollar amount could be a prosecutable offense. In the , Najib Razak lost his seat as prime minister to , who vowed to abolish the fake news law in his campaign, as the law was used to target him. After winning the election, the newly elected prime minister Mohammad has said, “Even though we support freedom of press and freedom of speech, there are limits." As of May 2018, Mohammad has supported amending the law, rather than a full abolition.

Paul Bernal, a lecturer in information and technology, fears that the fake news epidemic is a “Trojan horse” for countries like Malaysia to “control uncomfortable stories.” The vagueness of this law means that satirists, opinion writers, and journalists who make errors could face persecution. The law also makes it illegal to share fake news stories; a Danish man and Malaysian citizen were recently arrested for posting false news stories online and will consequently serve a month in jail.


Main article:


This section is empty. You can help by . (July 2018)


In 2015, reported on fake stories, using unrelated photographs and fraudulent captions, shared online in support of the .Fake news negatively affected individuals in , leading to a rise in . Online participation surged from one percent to 20 percent of Myanmar's total populace from 2014 to 2016. Fake stories from Facebook were reprinted in paper periodicals called Facebook and The Internet. False reporting related to practitioners of Islam in the country was directly correlated with increased attacks on . journalist Sheera Frenkel reported fake news fictitiously stated believers in Islam acted out in violence at Buddhist locations. She documented a direct relationship between the fake news and violence against Muslim people. Frenkel noted countries that were relatively newer to Internet exposure were more vulnerable to the problems of fake news and fraud.


In March 2018, the ’s compiled a list dubbed a “hall of shame” of articles with suspected attempts to influence political decisions. However, controversy arose when three Dutch media outlets claimed they had been wrongfully singled out because of quotes attributed to people with non-mainstream views. The news outlets included Post Online, , and . All three were flagged for publishing articles critical of policies, and none received any forewarning or opportunity to appeal beforehand. This incident has contributed to the growing issue of what defines news as fake, and how freedoms of press and speech can be protected during attempts to curb to spread of false news.


, the of , threatened to nuke on after a false story claiming that , the Israeli , said "If Pakistan send ground troops into Syria on any pretext, we will destroy this country with a nuclear attack."


See also:

Fake news has been problematic in the Philippines where social media has outsized political influence. Following the 2016 Philippine election, Senator filed that there be an inquiry of conduct of social media platforms that allowed for the spreading of fake news. Pangilinan called for penalties for social media platforms that provided the public with false information about his ideas. The news that came out was meant to discredit the opposing party and used social media as an outlet to bring propaganda into the mainstream media. According to media analysts, developing countries such as the Philippines, with the generally new access to social media and democracy, feel the problem of fake news to a larger extent. Facebook is one of the largest platforms being an open website, that works as a booster to sway the opinion of the public due to manufactured stories. While Facebook provides free media sources, it does not provide its users with the access to fact checking websites. Because of this, government authorities call for a tool that will filter out "fake news" to secure the integrity of cyberspace in the Philippines., a social news network in the Philippines, investigated online networks of supporters and discovered that they include fake news, fake accounts, bots and trolls, which Rappler thinks are being used to silence dissent. The creation of fake news, and fake news accounts on social media has been a danger to the political health of the country. According to Kate Lamble and Megha Mohan of BBC news, "What we're seeing on social media again is manufactured reality… They also create a very real chilling effect against normal people, against journalists (who) are the first targets, and they attack in very personal ways with death threats and rape threats." Journalists are often risking their lives in publishing articles that contest fake news in the Philippines.

was influenced, in large part, by false information propagated by fake news outlets. By New York Times contributor Miguel Syjuco’s account, President Rodrigo Duterte benefited from a disproportionate amount of complimentary fake news compared to his opponents. The pro-Duterte propaganda spread across Filipino social media include fake endorsements from prominent public figures like and . Duterte's own campaign was responsible for a portion of the misinformation spread during the election; according to a study from Oxford University’s Computational Propaganda Research Program, Duterte’s campaign paid an estimated 0,000 for dedicated trolls to undermine dissenters and disseminate misinformation in 2016.

An incident was the accusation made by regarding in which he tagged various opposition senators and other people as masterminds of the attack based on a photo shared through social media and other blog sites which produces fake news. Another government official, Communications Assistant Secretary has been accused of spreading fake news.

The prevalence of fake news in the Philippines have pushed lawmakers to file laws to combat it, like criminalizing its dissemination. The strongly opposes the spread of fake news as a sin, and published a list of fake news websites.


Polish historian  () noted fake news websites had infiltrated Poland through and sources that copied content from . Targalski observed there existed about 20 specific fake news websites in Poland that spread Russian disinformation in the form of fake news. One example cited was fake news that announced the Polish city of as occupied Polish land.

's anti-EU (PiS) government has been accused of spreading "illiberal disinformation" to undermine public confidence in the . Maria Snegovaya of Columbia University said: "The true origins of this phenomenon are local. The policies of Fidesz and Law and Justice have a lot in common with Putin's own policies."

Some mainstream outlets were long accused of fabricating half-true or outright false information. One of popular TV stations, TVN, in 2010 attributed to Jarosław Kaczyński (then an opposition leader) words that "there will be times, when true Poles will come to the power". However, Kaczyński has never uttered those words in the commented speech.


Under existing law, "Any person who transmits or causes to be transmitted a message which he knows to be false or fabricated shall be guilty of an offence".

On March 18, 2015, a fake screenshot of Prime Minister's Office website announcing the demise of the Mr went viral. Several international news agencies such as and fell for the prank and reported it as news. The image was created by a student to demonstrate to his classmates how fake news could be easily created and propagated. The student received stern police warning as a consequence.

The Minister for Law views the current remedies as limited and ineffective and has indicated that the government intends to introduce legislation to combat fake news in 2018.

The Mothership, which was founded by ex-Minister , has been rapped by MOE for propagating fake news on Singapore's culture of compliance purportedly made by its official. The States Times Review, which claimed a near-zero turnout to mock at the late President 's state funeral, was singled out by for spreading fake news. Even, STOMP, owned by government-controlled has not been spared of such accusations.

It does not help that the integrity and impartiality of the is in doubt due to political interference and . Legislation against fake news is regarded by some as a further attempt to curb the free flow of information, so that only the "real news", as dictated by the government, gets disseminated to the public.

A state-run website, Factually, has been set up by the Ministry of Communications and Information to present the government's version of news, purportedly to represent "facts" and counter "falsehoods", especially on issues of public interest such as environment, housing and transport.

A Parliamentary Select Committee led by Punggol East MP has been set up to tackle fake news by proposing new laws. Ironically, Charles Chong himself is accused of spreading falsehood in the which played a significant role in his victory over Workers' Party MP . Renowned historian Dr Thum Ping Tjin pointed out that the PAP government has been the major perpetrator of fake news and listed the as the most significant fake news that has ever occurred in Singapore.

Internet giants and warned Singapore against introducing new laws to combat "fake news", saying that existing legislation is adequate to address the problem and that an effective way of combating misinformation is through educating citizens on how to distinguish reliable from unreliable information.

The Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehood was accused of publishing falsehoods of its own in a summary report. Complaints of misrepresentation were lodged by five witnesses, forcing the committee to amend its report.

South Africa

A wide range of South African media sources have reported fake news as a growing problem and tool to both increase distrust in the media, discredit political opponents, and divert attention from corruption. Media outlets owned by the have been noted by other South African media organisations such as (South Africa), , and for targeting them. Individuals targeted include Finance Minister who was seen as blocking Gupta attempts at with accusations levelled against Gordhan of promoting state capture for "".

The (ANC) was taken to court by Sihle Bolani for unpaid work she did during the election on the ANC's behalf. In court papers Bolani stated that the ANC used her to launch and run a covert R50 million fake news and campaign during the with the intention of discrediting opposition parties.

South Korea

South Korean journalists and media experts lament political hostility between Korea's which distorts and North Korea has attributed erroneous reporting to South Korea and United States with being critical to media organization while also American journalist had made similar criticisms on media coverage of North.


Fake news in Spain has become much more prevalent in the past year, but has been a major factor in Spain's history. The government published a fake article in regards to the purchase of the from Spain, which they had already purchased. Despite this, the topic of fake news has traditionally not been given much attention to in Spain, until the newspaper launched the new blog dedicated strictly to truthful news entitled "Hechos"; which literally translates to "fact" in Spanish. David Alandete, the managing editor of El País, stated how many people misinterpret fake news as real because the sites "have similar names, typography, layouts and are deliberately confusing" (Southern). Alandete made it the new mission of El País "to respond to fake news" (Scott). María Ramírez of has stated that much of the political fake news circulating in Spain is due to the lack of investigative journalism on the topics. Most recently El País has created a fact-checking position for five employees, to try and debunk the fake news released.


The issued a report in 2015 identifying propaganda from Russia infiltrating Sweden with the objective to amplify pro-Russian propaganda and inflame societal conflicts. The (MSB), part of the , identified fake news reports targeting in 2016 that originated from Russia. Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency official Mikael Tofvesson stated a pattern emerged where views critical of Sweden were constantly repeated. identified these tactics as a form of . The newspaper reported the MSB identified and as significant fake news purveyors. As a result of growth in this propaganda in Sweden, the MSB planned to hire six additional security officials to fight back against the campaign of fraudulent information.


In February 2017, reported that up to 13,000 people had been hanged in a Syrian prison as part of an “extermination” campaign. Syrian president questioned the credibility of Amnesty International and called the report "fake news" fabricated to undermine the government. "You can forge anything these days – we are living in a fake news era.”


In a report in December 2015 by , a fake video shared online showed people a light show purportedly made at the . The Northern Region Water Resources Office confirmed there was no light show at the reservoir and the event had been fabricated. The fraud led to an increase in tourist visits to the actual attraction.

According to the news updated paper from the Time World in regards the global threat to free speech, the Taiwanese government has reformed its policy on education and it will include "media literacy" as one part of school curriculum for the students. It will be included to develop the skills needed while using social media. Further, the work of media literacy will also include the skills needed to analyze propaganda and sources, so the student can clarify what is fake news.


Since the and the beginning of the in 2014, the Ukrainian media circulated several fake news stories and misleading images, including a dead rebel photograph with a Photoshop-painted tattoo which allegedly indicated that he belonged to Russian Special Forces, a video game screenshot disguised as a satellite image ostensibly showing the shelling of the Ukrainian border from Russia, and the threat of a Russian nuclear attack against the Ukrainian troops. The recurring theme of these fake news was that Russia was solely to blame for the crisis and the war in Donbass.

In 2015 the published a report criticizing Russian disinformation campaigns to disrupt relations between Europe and Ukraine after ouster of . According to , similar tactics were used by fake news websites during the US elections. A website, was created by Ukrainian activists in 2014 to debunk fake news in Ukraine, including .

On 29 May 2018, the Ukrainian media and state officials announced that the Russian journalist was assassinated in his apartment in Kiev. Later, Babchenko appeared to be alive, and the claimed that the staged assassination was needed to arrest a person who allegedly was planning a real assassination. , writing for Carnegie.ru, mentioned that the staged assassination of Babchenko was the first instance of fake news delivered directly by the highest officials of a state.

United Kingdom

See also:

On December 8, 2016, (MI6) delivered a speech to journalists at the where he called fake news and propaganda damaging to democracy. Younger said the mission of MI6 was to combat propaganda and fake news in order to deliver to his government a strategic advantage in the arena, and assist other nations including Europe. He called such methods of fake news propaganda online a "fundamental threat to our sovereignty". Younger said all nations that hold democratic values should feel the same worry over fake news.

However, definitions of "fake news" have been controversial in the UK, with being seen as a key element of . Members of Parliament in the UK have been advised against using the term "when describing the complexity of information disorder", as the term "fake news" is "woefully inadequate":

Neither the words 'fake' nor 'news' effectively capture this polluted information ecosystem. Much of the content used as examples in debates on this topic are not fake, they are genuine but used out of context or manipulated. Similarly, to understand the entire ecosystem of polluted information, we need to consider far more than content that mimics 'news'.

United States

See also: and

Fake news became a global subject and was widely introduced to billions as a subject mainly due to the 2016 U.S. presidential election. Numerous political commentators and journalists wrote and stated in media that 2016 was the year of fake news and as a result nothing will ever be the same in politics and cyber security. Due to the fair amount of fake news in 2016, it became hard to tell what was real in 2017. Donald Trump tweeted or retweeted posts about "fake news" or "fake media" 176 times as of Dec. 20, 2017, according to an online archive of all of Trump's tweets. Governmental bodies in the U.S. and Europe started looking at contingencies and regulations to combat fake news specially when as part of a coordinated intelligence campaign by hostile foreign governments. Online tech giants Facebook and Google started putting in place means to combat fake news in 2016 as a result of the phenomenon becoming globally known. Google Trends shows that the term "fake news" gained traction in online searches in October 2016.

Professor of the at the studied web traffic in the United States prior to the election. He found that about one half of all news on Twitter directed at was junk or fake, and the other half came from actual professional news sources.

According to , during the last three months of the presidential campaign, of the top twenty fake election-related articles on Facebook, seventeen were anti-Clinton or pro-Trump. Facebook users interacted with them more often than with stories from genuine news outlets.

Debate over the impact of fake news in the , and whether or not it significantly impacted the election of the candidate , whom the most shared fake stories favored, led researchers from to study the impact of fake news shared on social media, where 62% of U.S. adults get their news from. They assessed that 8% of readers of fake news recalled and believed in the content they were reading, though the same share of readers also recalled and believed in "placebos" — stories they did not actually read, but that were produced by the authors of the study. In comparison, over 50% of the participants recalled reading and believed in true news stories. The authors do not assess the final impact of these numbers on the election, but seek to "offer theoretical and empirical background" for the debate.

producers said President Trump uses the phrase "fake news" to mean something else: "I take offense with what you said."

In the United States in the run-up to the , fake news was particularly prevalent and spread rapidly over social media "bots", according to researchers at the . In a speech shortly after the election, former Democratic candidate warned of the "real-world consequences" of fake news. Shortly thereafter, in the early weeks of his presidency, U.S. President frequently used the term "fake news" to refer to traditional news media, singling out . Linguist says this creates confusion about the phrase's meaning. According to CBS 60 Minutes, President Trump may use the term fake news to describe any news, however legitimate or responsible, with which he may disagree.

After Republican used the term as a reference to a column in the , the newspaper's publisher threatened a lawsuit.

In December 2016, an armed man, Edgar Maddison Welch, traveled to , and opened fire at the Comet Ping Pong pizzeria, driven by a fake online news story known as the , which accused the pizzeria of hosting a pedophile ring run by Democratic Party leaders. These stories tend to go viral quickly. Social media systems, such as , play a large role in the broadcasting of fake news. These systems show users content that reflects their interests and history, leading to fake and misleading news. Following a with prosecutors, Welch pleaded guilty to the federal charge of interstate transport of firearms and a District of Columbia charge of assault with a dangerous weapon. Welch was sentenced to four years in prison on June 22, 2017 and agreed to pay ,744.33 for damages to the restaurant.

A situation study by shows how a tweet by a person with no more than 40 followers went viral and was shared 16,000 times on . The tweet concluded that protesters were paid to be bussed to Trump demonstrations and protest. A Twitter user then posted a photograph of two buses outside a building, claiming that those were the Anti-Trump protesters. The tweet immediately went viral on both Twitter and Facebook. Fake news can easily spread due to the speed and accessibility of modern communications technology.

A investigation examined exactly how fake news can start to trend. There are "bots" used by fake news publishers that make their articles appear more popular than they are. This makes it more likely for people to discover them. "Bots are fake social media accounts that are programmed to automatically 'like' or retweet a particular message."

Fraudulent stories during the included a popularized on Facebook that had endorsed Trump, and another that actor "backs Trump in the most epic way possible". Trump's son and campaign surrogate , top national security adviser , and then-campaign managers and shared fake news stories during the campaign.

Starting in July 2017, President Trump's launched , an online news program posted on Facebook. The series reports on Trump's accomplishments as and claims to highlight "" as opposed to alleged "fake news". introduced one video by saying "If you are tired of all the fake news out there...we are going to bring you nothing but the facts" and "I bet you haven't heard about all the accomplishments the president had this week, because there's so much fake news out there". The show has been labelled as "propaganda".

In January 2018, it was reported that a Gallup-Knight Foundation survey found that 17% of Democrats and 42% of Republicans "consider accurate news stories that cast a politician or political group in a negative light to always be 'fake news.'" A June 2018 poll by and found that 72% of Americans believe "traditional news outlets knowingly report false or misleading stories at least sometimes," with 92% of Republican and Republican-leaning independents and 53% of Democrats believing this.


Further information: and

On 4 August 2018, a documentary by German broadcaster stated that a documentary titled "Venezuela — Escape from a Failed State" was censored from Venezuelan television programming. On social media, Venezuelans voiced their anger of not being able to watch the program. Venezuela's journalist union SNTP stated that the state-run was responsible for the incident, with CONATEL denying the reports of censorship, stating "Media of the right circulate fake news to destabilize the peace of the country".

See also


Definition of Free Cultural Works logo notext.svg This article incorporates text from a work. Licensed under CC BY SA 3.0 IGO : , 202, University of Oxford, UNESCO. To learn how to add text to Wikipedia articles, please see . For information on , please see .


  1. ^ . 
  2. ^ Leonhardt, David; Thompson, Stuart A. (June 23, 2017). . . Retrieved June 23, 2017. 
  3. Himma-Kadakas, Marju (July 2017). "Alternative facts and fake news entering journalistic content production cycle". Cosmopolitan Civil Societies: An Interdisciplinary Journal. 9 (2): 25–41. :. 
  4. ^ Hunt, Elle (December 17, 2016). . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  5. Schlesinger, Robert (April 14, 2017). . .
  6. . Merriam-Webster. Retrieved October 13, 2017.
  7. ^ Woolf, Nicky (November 11, 2016). . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  8. . POLITICO. September 14, 2017. Retrieved September 15, 2017. 
  9. Carlos Merlo (2017), , Univision Noticias 
  10. ; Lefferman, Jake; Pedersen, Claire; Martz, Geoff (November 29, 2016). . . .
  11. Callan, Paul. . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  12. ^ Lind, Dara (May 9, 2018). . . Retrieved May 10, 2018. 
  13. Murphy, Jennifer. . libraryguides.vu.edu.au. Retrieved 2018-08-12. 
  14. . . April 3, 2017. Fake news – a neologism to describe stories that are just not true, like , and a term now co-opted to characterize unfavorable news – has given new urgency to the teaching of media literacy 
  15. ^ H. Allcott; M.Gentzkow (2017). (PDF). Journal of Economic Perspectives. 31 (2): 211–236. :. Retrieved May 3, 2017. 
  16. Lazer, David M. J.; Baum, Matthew A.; Benkler, Yochai; Berinsky, Adam J.; Greenhill, Kelly M.; Menczer, Filippo; Metzger, Miriam J.; Nyhan, Brendan; Pennycook, Gordon (2018-03-09). . Science. 359 (6380): 1094–1096. :.  .  . 
  17. Bounegru, Liliana; Gray, Jonathan; Venturini, Tommaso; Mauri, Michele (January 8, 2018). . Amsterdam: Public Data Lab. p. 8. 
  18. Wardle, Claire (February 16, 2017). . firstdraftnews.com. Retrieved April 22, 2017. 
  19. Shafer, Jack (November 22, 2016). . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  20. Gobry, Pascal-Emmanuel (December 12, 2016). . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  21. Greenwald, Glenn. . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  22. Morrissey, Edward. . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  23. . . January 30, 2017. 
  24. Marquardt, David Z. Hambrick,Madeline. . Retrieved April 24, 2018. 
  25. . Retrieved April 24, 2018. 
  26. ^ Cillizza, Chris (May 9, 2018). . . Retrieved May 10, 2018. 
  27. ^ Chait, Jonathan (May 9, 2018). . magazine. Retrieved May 10, 2018. 
  28. ^ Bump, Philip (May 9, 2018). . . Retrieved May 10, 2018. 
  29. . IFLA blogs. January 27, 2017. Retrieved February 16, 2017. 
  30. . Poynter. September 15, 2016. Retrieved March 25, 2017. 
  31. . Poynter. December 8, 2016. Retrieved March 25, 2017. 
  32. Creagh, Sunanda; Mountain, Wes (February 17, 2017). . The Conversation. Retrieved March 2, 2017. 
  33. ^ . biography.com. A&E Television Networks. Retrieved July 4, 2017. 
  34. Weir, William (2009). History's Greatest Lies. Beverly, Massachusetts: Fair Winds Press. pp. 28–41.  . 
  35. Kaminska, Izabella (January 17, 2017). . Financial Times. Financial Times. Retrieved July 4, 2017. 
  36. MacDonald, Eve (January 13, 2017). . The Conversation. The Conversation. Retrieved July 4, 2017. 
  37. Ferguson, Everett (1993). Backgrounds of Early Christianity (second ed.). Grand Rapids, Michigan: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. pp. 556–564.  . 
  38. Sherwin-White, A. N. (April 1964). "Why Were the Early Christians Persecuted? – An Amendment". Past and Present (27): 23–27.  . 
  39. Gwynn, David M. (2015). . London, England: Bloomsbury Sources in Ancient History. p. 16.  . Retrieved July 2, 2017. 
  40. Clark, Gillian (2004). . Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. p. 36.  . Retrieved July 2, 2017. 
  41. UK Historical Association Check |url= value ().  Missing or empty |title= ()
  42. Dennis, Chris. . UK Historical Association
  43. ^ . Magazine. Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  44. . Anti-Defamation League
  45. ^ Borel, Brooke (January 4, 2017). . . Retrieved March 8, 2017. 
  46. Darnton, Robert (February 13, 2017). . . Retrieved March 8, 2017. 
  47. O'Brien, Conor Cruise. . The Atlantic. Retrieved June 29, 2017. 
  48. . POLITICO Magazine. Retrieved June 29, 2017. 
  49. . www.history.org. Retrieved June 29, 2017. 
  50. . history.com. August 25, 1835. Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  51. . Office of the Historian. Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  52. . . February 17, 2017. Retrieved March 5, 2017. 
  53. ^ . . Archived from on February 12, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  54. . www.ushmm.org. Retrieved June 29, 2017. 
  55. Wortman, Marc (January 29, 2017). . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  56. . December 19, 2016. Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  57. . Carnegie Europe. January 25, 2017. Retrieved February 14, 2017. Stalin fed fake news to New York Times correspondent Walter Duranty, who won a Pulitzer Prize for depicting Russia as a socialist paradise. 
  58. . history.com. 
  59. Chilton, Martin (May 6, 2016). . . 
  60. Burkhardt, Johanna. . 
  61. Jeremy W. Peters (December 25, 2016). . . 
  62. . . 
  63. . . September 12, 2014. Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  64. . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  65. . . Raleigh, N.C. Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  66. Sydell, Laura (November 23, 2016). . . 
  67. Davies, Dave (December 14, 2016). . . 
  68. ^ . . November 17, 2016. Retrieved May 5, 2017. 
  69. Kirby, Emma Jane (December 5, 2016). . . 
  70. LaCapria, Kim (November 2, 2016). . . 
  71. Hathaway, Jay (October 20, 2014). . Gawker. 
  72. ^ Hedegaard, Erik (November 29, 2016). . . Retrieved November 29, 2016. 
  73. . Miramax. December 5, 2013. Archived from on April 1, 2017. Retrieved April 28, 2017. 
  74. Gunaratna, Shanika (November 17, 2016). . . 
  75. Jacobson, Louis (November 17, 2016). . . 
  76. Daro, Ishmael N. (October 28, 2016). . . 
  77. French, Sally (November 18, 2016). . . 
  78. Bratu, Becky; et al. (December 15, 2016). . . CS1 maint: Explicit use of et al. ()
  79. Genzlinger, Neil (November 17, 2016). . . 
  80. Madigan, Charles M. (November 21, 2016). . . 
  81. . Inside Edition. November 18, 2016. 
  82. Welch, Dennis (February 16, 2017). . .
  83. .. CNN.
  84. Collinson, Stephen (February 16, 2017). . CNN.
  85. . Streamovations. March 8, 2017.
  86. Daro, Ishmael N. (March 9, 2017). . .
  87. Nashrulla, Tasneem (November 8, 2013). . BuzzFeed.
  88. Madan, Karuna (November 21, 2013). . Gulf News India.
  89. Bratu, Becky; Calabrese, Erin; Chirbas, Kurt; Saliba, Emmanuelle; Howard, Adam (December 15, 2016). .
  90. Frank, Priscilla (April 19, 2017). . .
  91. []. /. May 26, 2017.
  92. Tait, Amelia (February 9, 2016). . . Retrieved March 7, 2017. published online February 11, 2017 as "Fake news is a problem for the left, too". 
  93. ^ . . March 26, 2017. Retrieved March 27, 2017. 
  94. Macfarquhar, Neil (August 28, 2016). . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  95. . . February 11, 2017. Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  96. Watanabe, Kohei (February 8, 2017). . The Journal of International Communication. 23 (1): 138–158. :.  . 
  97. Vidya Narayanan, Vlad Barash, John Kelly, Bence Kollanyi, Lisa-Maria Neudert, and Philip N. Howard (February 8, 2018). . Oxford: The Computational Propaganda Project. Retrieved March 31, 2018. CS1 maint: Multiple names: authors list ()
  98. Hern, Alex (February 6, 2018). . The Guardian. Retrieved March 31, 2018. 
  99. ^ Guess, Andrew; Nyhan, Brendan; Reifler, Jason (January 9, 2018). (PDF). . Retrieved February 4, 2018. 
  100. ^ Sarlin, Benjy (January 14, 2018). . NBC News. Retrieved February 4, 2018. 
  101. . Poynter Institute. January 3, 2018. Retrieved February 5, 2018. 
  102. Spohr, Dominic (2017). . Business Information Review. 34 (3): 150–160. :. 
  103. World Trends in Freedom of Expression and Media Development Global Report 2017/2018. : UNESCO. 2018. p. 202. 
  104. Bounegru, Liliana, Jonathan Gray, Tommaso Venturini, and Michele Mauri. 2017. A Field Guide to Fake News. Public Data Lab.
  105. Byrne, Andrew. 2016. Macedonia’s fake news industry sets sights on Europe. Financial Times. Available at . Accessed 17 March 2017.
  106. Edelman. 2016. 2016 Edelman Trust Barometer Global Results. Edelman. Available at . Accessed 22 January 2017.
  107. Morozov, Evgeny. 2017. Moral panic over fake news hides the real enemy – the digital giants. The Guardian, sec. Opinion. Available at . Accessed 26 May 2017.
  108. Barthel, Michael, Amy Mitchell, and Jesse Holcomb. 2016. Many Americans Believe Fake News Is Sowing Confusion. Pew Research Center’s Journalism Project. Available at . Accessed 26 May 2017.
  109. Kuchler. 2016. Facebook begins testing ways to flag fake news. Financial Times. Available at . Accessed 26 May 2017
  110. Wingfield, Nick, Mike Isaac, and Katie Benner. 2016. Google and Facebook Take Aim at Fake News Sites. The New York Times. Available at . Accessed 26 May 2017.
  111. Burkhardt, Joanna (November–December 2017). . Library Technology Reports. 53: 5–33 – via Ebscohost. 
  112. Connolly, Kate; Chrisafis, Angelique; McPherson, Poppy; Kirchgaessner, Stephanie; Haas, Benjamin; Phillips, Dominic; Hunt, Elle; Safi, Michael (December 2, 2016). . . Retrieved January 17, 2017. 
  113. Chen, Adrian (June 2, 2015). . . Retrieved December 25, 2016. 
  114. LaCapria, Kim (November 2, 2016). . . Retrieved November 19, 2016. 
  115. Ben Gilbert (November 15, 2016). . . Retrieved November 16, 2016. Some of these sites are intended to look like real publications (there are false versions of major outlets like ABC and MSNBC) but share only fake news; others are straight-up propaganda created by foreign nations (Russia and Macedonia, among others) 
  116. By Jon Swartz, . March 11, 2017. Retrieved March 11, 2017.
  117. ^ Editorial, Reuters. . U.S. Retrieved 2018-04-10. 
  118. Spohr, Dominic (August 23, 2017). . Business Information Review. 34 (3): 150–160. :. 
  119. Burkhardt, Joanna M. (2017). . Library Technology Reports. 53: 14 – via ProQuest. 
  120. Isaac, Mike (December 12, 2016). . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  121. ^ . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  122. Gottfried, Jeffrey; Shearer, Elisa (May 26, 2016). . Pew Research Center's Journalism Project. Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  123. Goldsborough, Reid (June 2017). . Teacher Librarian. 44: 5 – via Ebscohost. 
  124. McClain, Craig (June 2017). . PLoS Biology. 15: 1–9 – via Ebscohost. 
  125. Solon, Olivia (November 10, 2016). . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  126. . Digital Trends. December 6, 2016. Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  127. Parkinson, Hannah Jane. . The Guardian. The Guardian. Retrieved July 4, 2017. 
  128. . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  129. ^ . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  130. . 6abc Philadelphia. November 23, 2016. Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  131. Isaac, Mike (November 12, 2016). . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  132. Barthel, Michael; Mitchell, Amy; Holcomb, Jesse (December 15, 2016). . Pew Research Center's Journalism Project. Retrieved January 27, 2017. 
  133. Oremus, Will (August 8, 2017). . . Retrieved August 11, 2017. 
  134. . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  135. . . November 20, 2016. Retrieved January 17, 2017. 
  136. Stein, Joel (August 2016). . Time.com: 106 – via Ebscohost. 
  137. Binns, Amy (August 2012). "Don't Feed the Trolls!". Journalism Practice. 6: 547–562 – via EBSCOhost. 
  138. Gross, Terry (October 2016). . NPR. Retrieved 30 May 2018. 
  139. Steain, Joel (August 18, 2016). . . 
  140. Watson, Kathryn (March 30, 2017). . . Retrieved September 20, 2017. 
  141. Holan, Angie Drobnic (December 13, 2016). . . 
  142. van der Linden, S.; Maibach, E.; Cook, J.; Leiserowitz, A.; Lewandowsky, S. (2017). "Inoculating Against Misinformation". Science. 358 (6367): 1141.2. :. 
  143. ^ LaCapria, Kim (March 2, 2017). . . 
  144. ^ Marr, Bernard (March 1, 2017). . . 
  145. Gillin, Joshua (January 27, 2017). . . 
  146. Kiely, Eugene; Robertson, Lori (November 18, 2016). . . 
  147. . Retrieved May 7, 2017. 
  148. ^ Stelter, Brian (January 15, 2017). . . Retrieved January 17, 2017. 
  149. ^ . . Retrieved January 17, 2017. 
  150. Chowdhry, Amit. . . 
  151. . . April 14, 2017. 
  152. ^ . Engadget. Retrieved 2018-05-30. 
  153. Rutenberg, Jim (April 16, 2017). . . Retrieved April 19, 2017. 
  154. Pak, Nataly; Seyler, Matt (July 19, 2018). . . Retrieved July 23, 2018. 
  155. Atkins, Larry (February 27, 2017). . The Hill. Retrieved March 9, 2017. 
  156. Felsenthal, Julia (March 3, 2017). . Vogue. Retrieved March 3, 2017. 
  157. Massie, Chris (February 7, 2017). . CNN. Retrieved March 27, 2017. 
  158. Page, Clarence (February 7, 2017). . Chicago Tribune. Retrieved February 9, 2017. 
  159. ^ Gendreau, Henri (February 25, 2017). . . Retrieved May 9, 2018. 
  160. @realDonaldTrump (May 9, 2018). (Tweet) – via . 
  161. Mangan, Dan (May 22, 2018). . . Retrieved May 30, 2018. 
  162. Woods, Sean (June 20, 2018). . . Retrieved July 23, 2018. 
  163. , Media Watch, episode 34, September 28, 2009,
  164. Remeikis, A. (2017). , .
  165. ^ Kirchner, Stephanie (December 14, 2016), , , retrieved December 14, 2016.
  166. ^ Kate Connolly; Angelique Chrisafis; Poppy McPherson; Stephanie Kirchgaessner; Benjamin Haas; Dominic Phillips; Elle Hunt (December 2, 2016). . The Guardian. Retrieved December 2, 2016.
  167. Cheadle, Bruce (November 17, 2016), , , , retrieved December 11, 2016.
  168. .
  169. . Retrieved July 31, 2017. 
  170. "". . January 2, 2017.
  171. , NetSuccess, s. r. o.,. . www.konspiratori.sk. Retrieved July 31, 2017. 
  172. Orlowski, Andrew (November 21, 2016), , , retrieved November 28, 2016.
  173. Pascaline, Mary (November 20, 2016), , , retrieved November 28, 2016.
  174. , , retrieved November 28, 2016.
  175. Dou, Eva (November 18, 2016), , , retrieved November 28, 2016.
  176. ^ Hernández, Javier C. (March 3, 2017). . . Retrieved July 13, 2017. Trump's attacks on the media will offer a good excuse for Chinese officials to step up their criticism of Western democracy and press freedom ... The Chinese government has long denounced Western news organizations as biased and dishonest – and in Mr. Trump, Beijing has found an American president who often does the same. 
  177. Hernández, Javier C. (March 3, 2017). . . Retrieved May 7, 2017. 
  178. . China Real Time Report blog. March 28, 2014. Retrieved April 28, 2017. 
  179. , , November 21, 2016, retrieved December 11, 2016.
  180. Bivort, Antoine (October 21, 2016). . Mediapart. Retrieved December 11, 2016. 
  181. Bevort,, Antoine (December 1, 2016). (in French). . Retrieved December 11, 2016. 
  182. Farand, C. (April 22, 2017). . 
  183. . Bakamo Social. Retrieved April 20, 2017. 
  184. Farand, C (April 22, 2017). . 
  185. Toor, A. (April 21, 2017). . 
  186. . Independent.co.uk. April 22, 2017. Retrieved November 5, 2017. 
  187. Farand, C. (April 22, 2017). . 
  188. Morenne, Benoît (May 6, 2017). . . Retrieved May 10, 2017. The campaign said that all of the stolen documents were 'legal' and 'authentic' but that fake ones had been added to 'sow doubt and disinformation'. 
  189. . . May 6, 2017. Retrieved May 10, 2017. A spokesperson said the communications only showed the normal functioning of a presidential campaign, but that authentic documents had been mixed on social media with fakes to sow "doubt and misinformation". 
  190. . . May 6, 2017. Retrieved May 10, 2017. 
  191. . The Hill. June 1, 2017. 
  192. Romm, T. (May 7, 2017). . 
  193. Murdock, Jason (November 30, 2016), , , retrieved December 1, 2016.
  194. ^ Doshi, Vidhi (October 1, 2017). . Washington Post. Retrieved December 30, 2017. 
  195. Singh, Manish. . Mashable. Retrieved December 30, 2017. 
  196. . Zee News. November 9, 2016.
  197. Kumar, Manoj. Retrieved June 27, 2018. 
  198. . . Retrieved 2018-06-30.  External link in |work= ()
  199. ^ Kwok, Yenni. . Time.com. Retrieved June 2, 2017. 
  200. Collins, Nick (December 7, 2010). . Telegraph.co.uk
  201. Jensen, Robert (March 25, 2016). . . Retrieved September 14, 2017. 
  202. ^ Dewan, Angela (May 5, 2017). . CNN. Retrieved November 10, 2017. 
  203. Crowe, Joe (May 8, 2017). . Newsmax. Retrieved November 10, 2017. 
  204. Morris, Loveday (August 13, 2017). . The Washington Post. Retrieved November 10, 2017. 
  205. ^ . Retrieved 2018-05-30. 
  206. ^ . Retrieved 2018-05-30. 
  207. . The New York Times. 2018-04-02.  . Retrieved 2018-05-30. 
  208. ^ . BBC News. 2018-05-14. Retrieved 2018-05-30. 
  209. ^ . CNET. 2018-05-13. Retrieved 2018-05-30. 
  210. Priday, Richard (April 5, 2018). . Wired. Retrieved 30 May 2018. 
  211. Domonoske, Kamila (April 30, 2018). . NPR. Retrieved 30 May 2018. 
  212. , , June 6, 2015, retrieved December 8, 2016.
  213. ^ Birnbaum, Michael (2018-04-25). . Washington Post.  . Retrieved 2018-05-30. 
  214. Goldman, Russell (December 24, 2016). . The New York Times. Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  215. Politi, Daniel (December 26, 2016). . . Retrieved December 29, 2016.
  216. ^ Javier, Kristian. . philstar.com. Retrieved June 2, 2017. 
  217. Javier, Kristian. . philstar.com. Retrieved June 2, 2017. 
  218. Mozur, Paul; Scott, Mark. . The New York Times. Retrieved June 2, 2017. 
  219. Mozur, Paul; Scott, Mark (November 17, 2016). . The New York Times.  . Retrieved June 29, 2017. 
  220. BBC. . bbc.com. Retrieved June 2, 2017. 
  221. Syjuco, Miguel (October 2017). . The New York Times
  222. Bradshaw, Samantha; Howard, Philip N. (Winter 2017). (PDF). Oxford Computational Propaganda Research Project: 21 – via Oxford University. 
  223. Ramos, Marlon. . newsinfo.inquirer.net. Retrieved June 29, 2017. 
  224. News, ABS-CBN. . 
  225. Santos, Eimor (June 22, 2017). . CNN Philippines. 
  226. Bajo, Anna Felicia (June 23, 2017). . . Retrieved June 28, 2017. 
  227. Bondoc, Marlly Rome (June 27, 2017). . . Retrieved June 28, 2017. 
  228. , , November 18, 2016, retrieved December 11, 2016.
  229. ^ "". . March 30, 2017.
  230. ""
  231. s.45, Telecommunications Act (Cap. 323), retrieved from on June 20, 2017
  232. migration (April 7, 2015). . The Straits Times. Retrieved June 29, 2017. 
  233. Au-Yong, Rachel (April 4, 2017). . . Retrieved April 28, 2017.
  234. . Channel NewsAsia. Retrieved June 29, 2017. 
  235. . Coconuts. April 4, 2017. 
  236. Voltaire. . 
  237. . September 11, 2017. 
  238. hermes (March 2, 2017). . 
  239. . February 17, 2018. 
  240. . redwiretimes.com
  241. . February 27, 2018. 
  242. . Retrieved April 24, 2018. 
  243. . redwiretimes.com. Retrieved April 24, 2018. 
  244. Daniels, Glenda (February 15, 2017). . . Retrieved February 27, 2017.
  245. Herman, Paul (February 2, 2017). . News24. Retrieved February 27, 2017.
  246. Ngoepe, Karabo (January 23, 2017). . . Retrieved January 29, 2017.
  247. Roux, Jean (January 23, 2017). . . Retrieved January 29, 2017.
  248. . Amabhungane.co.za. Retrieved January 29, 2017. 
  249. . www.enca.com. Africa News Agency. January 26, 2017. Retrieved January 29, 2017. 
  250. . . January 24, 2017. Retrieved January 29, 2017. 
  251. . August 10, 2015. 
  252. ^ . 
  253. Cabreza, Vincent. . newsinfo.inquirer.net. Retrieved June 5, 2017. 
  254. ^ . . January 30, 2017. Retrieved June 5, 2017. 
  255. Scott, Mark; Eddy, Melissa (February 20, 2017). . The New York Times.  . Retrieved June 5, 2017. 
  256. , , July 27, 2016, retrieved November 25, 2016.
  257. Farland, Chloe. . Independent. Retrieved January 17, 2018. 
  258. Smith, N. (2017). . . Retrieved April 28, 2017.
  259. . StopFake.org. July 30, 2014. 
  260. . Daily Star. August 14, 2014. 
  261. ^ J. L. Black, Michael Johns (2016). . Routledge. 
  262. , , retrieved November 24, 2016.
  263. (31 May 2018). (in Russian). carnegie.ru. Retrieved 31 May 2018. 
  264. Waterson, Jim (December 8, 2016), , , retrieved December 11, 2016.
  265. O'Grady, Sean (February 9, 2017). . . Retrieved March 5, 2017.
  266. Hern, Alex (7 February 2018). . The Guardian. Retrieved 1 August 2018. 
  267. Qui, Linda (April 27, 2017). . . Retrieved June 25, 2017. 
  268. Kessler, Glenn; Lee, Michelle Ye Hee (May 1, 2017). . . Retrieved June 25, 2017. 
  269. Drinkard, Jim; Woodward, Calvin (June 24, 2017). . . Retrieved June 25, 2017. 
  270. . Daily. November 29, 2016. Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  271. . . November 3, 2016. Retrieved March 28, 2017. 
  272. . The Somerville Times. January 11, 2017. Retrieved March 28, 2017. 
  273. . . March 22, 2017. Retrieved March 28, 2017. 
  274. Galvin, Gaby. . Archived from on 2017-12-30. 
  275. . . March 22, 2017. Retrieved March 28, 2017. 
  276. . . January 24, 2017. Retrieved March 28, 2017. 
  277. . . February 6, 2017. Retrieved March 28, 2017. 
  278. . . Reuters. February 6, 2017. Retrieved March 28, 2017. 
  279. Leetaru, Kalev. . . Retrieved April 19, 2017. 
  280. John Markoff (November 17, 2016). . . 
  281. Gideon Resnick (November 17, 2016). . . 
  282. Borchers, Callum (January 3, 2017). . . Retrieved February 20, 2018. 
  283. . . February 16, 2017. 
  284. . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  285. Callum Borchers (February 15, 2017). . "The Fix" blog. Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  286. . . Retrieved February 19, 2017. 
  287. . . Retrieved January 15, 2017. 
  288. . NPR.org. Retrieved June 28, 2017. 
  289. . March 23, 2017. 
  290. . . February 16, 2017. 
  291. John Markoff (November 17, 2016). . . 
  292. Alyssa Newcomb (November 15, 2016). . . Retrieved March 29, 2017. 
  293. Schaede, Sydney (October 24, 2016). . . Retrieved March 29, 2017. 
  294. (November 17, 2016). . . Retrieved March 29, 2017. 
  295. Dewey, Caitlin (November 17, 2016). . . Retrieved March 29, 2017. 
  296. Drum, Kevin (November 17, 2016). . blog. Retrieved March 29, 2017. 
  297. Sophia Tesfaye (August 2, 2017). . . Retrieved August 2, 2017. 
  298. Blake, Aaron. . . Retrieved August 13, 2017. 
  299. Wemple, Erik. . . Retrieved January 18, 2018. 
  300. . Axios. Retrieved June 27, 2018. 
  301. . . 6 August 2018. Retrieved 2018-08-07. 

Further reading

  • November 25, 2016
  • Elizabeth Schumacher (January 4, 2018). . . 
  • Bounegru, Liliana; Gray, Jonathan; Venturini, Tommaso; Mauri, Michele (January 8, 2018). . Amsterdam: Public Data Lab.  An open access guide exploring the use of digital methods to study false viral news, political memes, trolling practices and their social life online.

Related news

Free download photo share
Nac gala 2018 photos
Boutique d appareil photo
Malay girl nude photo
Como hacer una ampliadora fotografica casera
Webster hall nyc photos
Tu foto en dibujo animado